New legislation in Massachusetts could significantly reshape sports betting practices, introducing stricter controls, higher taxes, and limits on in-play betting.
Key Points of the Proposal
On 17 January, Massachusetts Senator John Keenan introduced the bill titled “An Act Addressing Economic, Health and Social Harms Caused by Sports Betting.” The legislation outlines the following measures:
- Ban on in-play betting: Placing bets during live games would no longer be permitted.
- Financial safeguards: Players spending over $1,000 daily or $10,000 monthly must undergo affordability checks. Betting amounts would also be capped at 15% of a player’s bank account balance.
- Tax increase: Digital betting tax rates would rise from 20% to 51%.
- Advertising restrictions: Sports betting advertisements during live events would be prohibited.
Operator Contributions and Penalties
Under the proposed changes, operators would face additional financial obligations, including:
- Doubling contributions to responsible gambling initiatives from $1 million to $2 million annually.
- Prohibition on incentivising players with rewards tied to betting volume or deposits.
Developments in Other States
Other U.S. states are also considering changes to sports betting regulations:
- Mississippi: Representative Cedric Burnett has reintroduced HB 682, aiming to legalise digital sports betting statewide. The bill would allow licensed casinos to provide betting services online and include esports in approved betting categories.
- Nebraska: On the same day, Senators Eliot Bostar and Stanley Clouse introduced two bills to legalise digital betting. The legislation would license racetracks to offer digital betting and lift restrictions on betting on in-state teams’ home games.
Broader Implications
If passed, these legislative proposals could significantly impact the sports betting landscape. While Massachusetts focuses on tighter regulations and consumer protections, Mississippi and Nebraska explore potential industry expansion. These efforts highlight the balance lawmakers seek between oversight and meeting growing demand for digital betting services.
